Top navigation skipped
San Saba County
2022 Confidence Interval Detail
San Saba County
206-902/Richland Springs ISD
Category Summary
| (1) Category |
(1) Local Value |
(1) Stratum Ratio |
(1) State Value |
(2) Sample Size |
(3) Total Parcels |
Stratum Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2,033,310 | 0.9106 | 2,232,934 | 15 | 55 | 0.036920028 |
| A | 1,992,030 | 1.0161 | 1,960,466 | 12 | 28 | 0.024221844 |
| A | 3,357,590 | 0.9769 | 3,436,984 | 13 | 32 | 0.005301160 |
| A | 5,383,100 | 1.0157 | 5,299,892 | 9 | 30 | 0.006707930 |
| E | 92,790,550 | 0.9219 | 100,651,426 | 19 | 581 | 0.037692127 |
| Random Totals: | 105,556,580 | 113,581,702 | 68 | 726 | ||
| CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES: | 18,931,948 | 18,778,156 | ||||
| CATG J EXCEPTION VALUES: | 4,688,270 | 5,261,404 | ||||
| Total Test Values | 129,176,798 | 137,621,262 |
Margin of Error
| Margin of Error Percent: | 6.3966815 |
|---|---|
| Margin of Error Value: | 8,803,194 |
Confidence Interval Values(5)
| Local Test Value: | 129,176,798 | WITHIN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL |
|---|---|---|
| State Lower Limit: | 128,818,068 | (State Test Value minus Margin of Error Percent) |
| State Upper Limit: | 146,424,456 | (State Test Value plus Margin of Error Percent) |
Sources:
(1) See Stratified Category Worksheet Reports PTS236, PTS430
(2) Number of parcels sampled by staff
(3) Total Category Parcels from Stratification Report, Appraisal Roll, or Self-report
(4) Includes any parcels in A, B, C, D2, E, F1, G1, G2, or L1 marked as exception properties
(5) Unstudied categories and sub-categories were not included in the Confidence Interval Values