The Vendor Performance Tracking System (VPTS) provides the state procurement community with a comprehensive tool for evaluating vendor performance to reduce risk in the contract awarding process. The VPTS tracks exceptional, satisfactory and unsatisfactory vendor performance.
Reporting of vendor performance is mandated by the Texas Government Code (TGC), §2262.055, and 34 Texas Administrative Code (TAC), §20.108. The requirement applies to purchases over $25,000 from contracts administered by the CPA or any other purchase over $25,000 made through delegated authority granted by CPA; purchases made pursuant to Government Code Chapter 10, Subtitle D, or purchases exempt from CPA procurement rules and procedures. Agencies are also encouraged to report vendor performance on purchases under $25,000 and associated with purchase orders issued throughout the life a a contract, not just at its conclusion.
Through the use of data obtained through vendor performance reports (VPRs), the system:
Agencies may report on performance for both active and inactive Centralized Master Bidders List (CMBL) vendors, as well as vendors not on the CMBL.
The purpose of the Vendor Performance Tracking System is to:
Vendor performance scores ranging from 0 percent to 100 percent are broken into four categories:
The scoring system begins to actively tally the score after 10 purchase orders. Scores more than two years old are not used in calculations. Each purchase order without a complaint provides a positive score of 100 percent for that vendor. Each negative VPR counts as a 0 in the corresponding category. The scores are averaged for each category.
Example: Ten purchase orders have been issued to a vendor. Nine purchase orders do not have associated complaints. One of the purchase orders resulted in an unsatisfactory commodity delivery. A VPR with an unsatisfactory commodity delivery has been issued. The vendor's commodity delivery score would be 90 percent (100+100+100+100+100+100+100+100+100+0 ÷ 10 or 900 ÷ 10). The vendor's commodity performance score would be 100 because there are no negative reports against that category.
Submit a vendor performance report through the CPA Web Applications Portal.
After submittal: The vendor has 14 calendar days to respond to the report if unsatisfactory codes are included. If the vendor does not respond, and the purchase order was issued from a CPA term contract, the Statewide Procurement Division (SPD) will send the vendor a letter explaining the importance of doing so and setting another deadline. Responses are forwarded to the agency that originally submitted the vendor performance report for review. The SPD will work with the agency and vendor to achieve resolution for concerns raised. Once resolved, vendor and agency comments are added to the report, and it is finalized and closed.
If no response is received to the follow-up letter, the vendor performance coordinator will pursue resolution by alternate means.
If the unsatisfactory report is not from a CPA term contract, it will be referred back to the agency issuing the purchase order for resolution. A notation will be added to the vendor performance report noting the referral.
View reports for all vendors including those not on the CMBL. No scores are displayed at this link.
Vendor performance reports for active and inactive CMBL vendors may be found by searching the CMBL. Scores are displayed on the individual vendor's profile page.
In 2015, the Texas Legislature passed House Bill 855, which requires state agencies to publish a list of the three most commonly used Web browsers on their websites. The Texas Comptroller’s most commonly used Web browsers are Google Chrome, Microsoft Internet Explorer and Apple Safari.